Thursday, 29 December 2011

World’s ‘best’ national anthem ... Jana Gana Mana ...

UNESCO Chooses Indian National Anthem as Best In The World

 World’s ‘best’ national anthem

The buzz on the Internet is that Jana Gana Mana, the Indian national anthem, has been declared as the world’s best national anthem by UNESCO. With the speed that these things travel, one email multiplies into thousands and then before you know it, rumour becomes fact. Although one of the sites clarifies that this is an unauthenticated piece of news doing the rounds, newspaper inboxes are flooded with ‘proud to be Indian’ emails. It’s evident that national pride is running high in these terror-struck times. And this has given ordinary citizens a thing to revel in. Obviously, they express great joy at India’s having the world’s best national anthem. The UNESCO site, however, is completely silent on the matter.

Buddha’s Advice to Calm a Disturbed Mind ...

Once Buddha was walking from one town to another town with a few of his followers... This was in the initial days. While they were traveling, they happened to pass a lake. They stopped there and Buddha told one of his disciples, “I am thirsty. Do get me some water from that lake there.”

The disciple walked up to the lake. When he reached it, he noticed that right at that moment, a bullock cart started crossing through the lake. As a result, the water became very muddy, very turbid. The disciple thought, “How can I give this muddy water to Buddha to drink!”

So he came back and told Buddha, “The water in there is very muddy. I don’t think it is fit to drink.” After about half an hour, again Buddha asked the same disciple to go back to the lake and get him some water to drink. The disciple obediently went back to the lake.

This time too he found that the lake was muddy. He returned and informed Buddha about the same. After sometime, again Buddha asked the same disciple to go back. The disciple reached the lake to find the lake absolutely clean and clear with pure water in it. The mud had settled down and the water above it looked fit to be had. So he collected some water in a pot and brought it to Buddha.

Buddha looked at the water, and then he looked up at the disciple and said,” See what you did to make the water clean. You let it be…. and the mud settled down on its own – and you got clear water. Your mind is also like that! When it is disturbed, just let it be. Give it a little time. It will settle down on its own. You don’t have to put in any effort to calm it down. It will happen. It is effortless..........

Saturday, 17 December 2011

मी ...



ह्म्म्म...!
स्वतः बद्दल काय सांगायच ..
स्वतःची स्तुती स्वतःच करू नये ना ..!

मी एकदम हलव्या मनाचा आहे .. मला मैत्री करायला आवडते ..
मी अतिशय शांत आहे पण कधिकधितरी राग हा येणारच ना ..

खूप खूप नाती जोडली आणि ती टिकवलीसुदधा .. पण, कधी कधी माणसे ओळखण्यात चुक झाली .. काही वेळेस नुकसान पण झाले ..
मग एक मनाशी ठरविले की, नाते जोडायचे पण .. थोडासा विचार करुनच ..

पण चलता है यार .. मला अभिमान आहे माझ्या सहानशिलतेचा ..
खूप प्रश्न पडतात आयुष्यात .. कधी कधी त्यांची उत्तरे शोधता-शोधता मीच हरवून जातो त्या प्रश्नामध्ये ..

आयुष्यातील प्रत्येक क्षण आनंदाने आणि हसत हसत घालवायला आवडते ..
मी काही फार काही छान असा मुलगा नाही अगदी साधा आणि सरळ, चार चौघामध्ये वावरणारा ..

आयुष्यात खूप चांगले मित्र मला लाभले .. प्रसंगी त्यांनी मला सावरले सुदधा ..

बस्स्स .. मला वाटतं इतक्या गोष्टी पुरेश्या असतील माझ्याबद्दल जाणून घेण्यासाठी ..!! :)

Our Bundles of Joy - Sachet (Sashee) - My Nephew

Born on 1st March 2011 at Solapur

Welcome to this beautiful world to do beautiful things

Sashee with me

Curious Sashee, what to do? :)

Crawling here n there


Life at the Mumbai is full of diapers, tears, and messes, but also TONS of laughter, joy, and fun! 


Full on Mastiii



Our Sachet (Sashee) another source of much laughter in our family. It's hard to believe, but is already eight months old today (1st November 2011). He is crawling and he has 5 teeth, growing very fast, and he is smiley and cool but very small hairs and hope his hair will grow fast!

9 and 1/2 months Sashi .. (15th December 2011)

Tuesday, 13 December 2011

स्मिता...


 
 स्मिता पाटीलचा आज २५ वा स्मृतीदिन

मुंबई : भूमिकामधली उषा, अर्थमधली पूजा, जैत रे जैतमधली चिंधी किंवा उंबरठामधली सुलभा...या सर्व व्यक्तिरेखांना मूर्त रुप देणारी समर्थ अभिनेत्री म्हणजे स्मिता पाटील. अवघ्या ११ वर्षांच्या कारकिर्दीत स्वतःच्या अभिनयाचा एक वेगळा ठसा उमटवणाऱ्या स्मिता पाटीलचा आज २५ वा स्मृतीदिन. वयाच्या ३६ व्या वर्षीच स्मिताने जगाचा निरोप घेतला...मात्र मागे ठेवून गेली अनेक भूमिका आणि अभिनयाचा मापदंड. म्हणून आजही अनेक नवोदित अभिनेत्रींसाठी स्मिता पाटील हा आदर्श आहे. अनेक अभिनेत्रींमध्ये स्मिता पाटीलची छबी शोधणण्याचा प्रयत्न रसिक करतात, पण तरीही स्मिताची जागा २५ वर्षे रिकामीच आहे.

खरं तर रुढार्थाने नटीकडे असावं असं रुप तिच्याकडे नव्हतं. तरीही ती विलक्षण देखणी होती. खूप काही व्यक्त करणारे डोळे आणि बोलका चेहरा ही तिची बलस्थानं होती. त्याच्याच जोरावर अनेक व्यक्तिरेखा तिने जिवंत केल्या.

स्मिता पाटीलने फिल्म अँड टेलिव्हिजन इन्स्टिट्यूटमधून शिक्षण घेतल्यानंतर श्याम बेनेगलांच्या चरणदास चोर मधून चित्रपटसृष्टीत पदार्पण केलं. त्या काळात चित्रपटसृष्टीत मनोरंजनाच्या पलिकडे जाणाऱ्या वास्तववादी चित्रपटांचा एक प्रवाह निर्माण होत होता. याच समांतर, कलात्मक चित्रपटांच्या प्रवाहात गोविंद निहलानी, श्याम बेनेगेल, जब्बार पटेल अशा दिग्गजांसोबत स्मिताचा प्रवास सुरु झाला. जाणीवपूर्वक चोखालळलेल्या या वाटेवर स्मिताच्या वाट्याला  दर्जेदार भूमिका, रसिकांची पावती आणि समीक्षकांचं कौतुक येत गेलं.

मात्र आर्ट फिल्मची नायिका असाच शिक्का स्मितावर बसला होता. तत्कालिन काही अभिनेत्रींनी तर स्मिता जे करते ते आम्ही करत नाही हे मान्य, पण  आम्ही जे करतो ते स्मितानं करावं, अशीही विधानं केली होती. त्यामुळे मग स्मिताने नमकहलाल, शक्तिसारखे व्यावसायिक चित्रपटही केले. पण पावसात भिजत नाचण्याचा, झाडांमागे पळण्याचा तिचा पिंड नव्हता हेही खरंच...

स्मिताला भूमिका आणि चक्रसाठी स्मिताला राष्ट्रीय पुरस्कार मिळाले. जैत रे जैत आणि उंबरठा या चित्रपटांसाठीही तिला सर्वोत्कृष्ट अभिनेत्रीचे फिल्मफेअर पुरस्कार मिळाले. भारत सरकारनेही पद्मश्री देऊन स्मिताच्या चित्रपटातील योगदानाचा गौरव केला.

कदाचित पुरस्कारांची, सन्मानाची यादी आणखीही वाढली असती...पण स्मिताने त्याआधीच एक्झिट घेतली होती...कोणाच्याही ध्यानीमनी नसताना...

Friday, 9 December 2011

Brutal Sehwag's hunger knows no bounds

New Delhi: On February 24, 2010, a barrier that had not been breached in 2961 one-day internationals finally fell in Gwalior, and it was fitting that Sachin Tendulkar, the owner of the most ODI runs ever, was the first to reach 200 in an innings.
On December 8, 2011, that record was overhauled in stunning manner by the man many around the world expected to have done so by now, a man dubbed a Tendulkar clone in the infancy of his international career. It took just 260 ODIs for someone to eclipse Tendulkar's record, and that individual was Virender Sehwag. 
On February 11 this year, Sehwag had sounded a warning to rival sides by stating his intent to bat out 50 overs – a feat he had never achieved before. That plan took a while in executing, though he came close in his first innings since making that statement when he slammed 175 in the World Cup opener in Dhaka, batting until the 48th over. Eleven innings and almost ten months later, including which he suffered injuries and missed several months of action, Sehwag picked a good time to produce the record achievement. His own form had been patchy and a series win was on the line, should India have lost.
Sehwag's success, as he has often stated, is due in large part to an uncluttered mind. This was evident today, as he shut out his own form and the pressure of captaincy to bludgeon an innings of sublime power, speed and determination. It was as if Sehwag had saved up all his energy for this one innings
He began in top gear and didn't slow down until he had crossed 200, no doubt fatigued by having batted so long. The first of his 25 boundaries – a total that equalled the record set by Tendulkar during his double – came off the second ball he faced; his first six, off the eighth ball. From there on matters were a blur as Sehwag sped to his fifty in 41 balls with his fourth six, and a 15th ODI century needed just 69 balls – making it his quickest three-figure knock ever. His previous fastest had been his maiden ODI century, scored off 70 balls against New Zealand in 2001.
Thereon, the runs ticked over. His 150 was passed in 112 balls, after which Sehwag was dropped by Darren Sammy on 170 in the deep. Without emoting, Sehwag returned to the stumps and sped into the 190s, and after raising 8,000 career runs with a flick to fine leg, smashed a short and wide delivery to the deep backward point ropes to move to 201. Unlike Tendulkar in Gwalior last year, Sehwag had plenty of time to reach the landmark and he appeared set to try to push for 250 until he was dismissed in the 47th over for 219. It was a sublime innings.
Martin Crowe, the former New Zealand captain, reckoned that batting must be instinctive; the ability to "see the ball early and play it late". That, in essence, is what Sehwag’s batting is all about. He moves only when the ball leaves the bowler's hand, thus giving little away. And when he does move, there is minimal fuss. This was evident in his stroke-play against the quick bowlers today.
Against Ravi Rampaul and Kemar Roach, his footwork was mostly decisive and when he wasn’t to the pitch – such as against Sammy and Andre Russell – he threw the bat at ball and with great power ensured the ball went over the infield. His minimal movement ensured Sehwag never got into awkward positions. Notice the boundaries hit off Marlon Samuels in the 34th and 36th overs: first, Sehwag made room to carve four past point, then he patted – yes, patted – a full toss past extra cover, and followed up next ball by opening the face of the bat and steering four more between backward point and cover-point. Sehwag doesn’t turn an aggressive stroke into a defensive prod. He waits a fraction longer and then converts a prod into a lofted drive or steers it wide of fielders.
As Sehwag said during the mid-innings break, he had never dreamed of scoring an ODI double-century. "I know people expected me to score a double-century, so thanks to them. And thanks to my family. I had said earlier that the top order was not contributing, and it was my job. I never changed my batting through this innings. I just told my self that I needed to bat through the batting Powerplay, and I would get the double-hundred. When Sammy dropped my chance, I knew God was with me. I am tired, yes; I am an old man now.
Now that Sehwag knows what it takes to bat 50 overs, and what his doing so can result it, it is a scary to imagine what he can produce. For him the challenge in ODIs has been to convert starts into sizeable knocks; he has 14 centuries and 37 fifties. Perhaps this epic innings will turn the tide. If it does, the man who has enthralled fans the world across for over a decade may give bowlers plenty of torment in the 50-over format. And that, in its own unique way, is a mesmerizing thought.

Tuesday, 6 December 2011

When Losing Weight, Slow is Fast and Fast is Slow

We live in the age of instant gratification. Everything must happen overnight. This is not surprising as the internet age requires things done at dizzying speeds. Unfortunately, our bodies have not evolved to allow such drastic changes. The same goes for someone trying to lose weight. When trying to lose weight, slow is fast and fast is slow.

Fast is Slow
 Weight Loss - Fast is Slow
When it comes to losing weight, fast can be extremely slow. You may be asking by now, how this is possible. That is because fast weight loss is never sustainable. One is only able to sustain weight loss if the weight loss is attributed to the loss of fat. Unsustainable weight loss is attributed to the loss of water and muscles. Water loss is not very useful as the body will try to restore hydration levels once more water is available. Muscle loss can actually be detrimental to long-term weight loss. Loss of muscles result in a sluggish metabolism. The more muscles loss, the slower the metabolism. The slower the metabolism, the easier it is to regain weight. The slower the metabolism, the faster one would regain lost weight.
Another major factor for failure in fast weight loss methods is the inability to cultivate the correct habits. The reason someone is overweight in the first place is due to unhealthy habits. Unhealthy eating with irregular or no exercise has probably resulted in the extra weight. These habits have to be eradicated first before the fat can be burnt. Any quick fix method that results in temporary weight loss will not be sustainable as the bad habits will cause the weight to come back with a vengeance.
Weight loss follows the law of the farm. Just like the process of pregnancy takes 9 months, the process of losing weight must also take its due course. Nobody gained weight over night. Gaining weight is a process of months and sometimes years. Reversing the process or losing weight should also be given adequate time.

Fast Weight Loss
Fast weight loss could include any form of starvation diets that cut calories down drastically. Some of these starvation diets that I have seen lately include the cabbage diet, lemonade diet, liquid diet. Any diet that tries to achieve weight loss by reducing calories drastically and does not have an element of exercise incorporated should be avoided like the plague.
There are also other fast weight loss methods such as diet pills or drugs. None of these provide a permanent solution. The results are temporary and never sustainable.

Slow is Fast
Weight Loss - Slow is Fast
Those who are patient are able to get tremendous long-term results. These are the people who get long-term and sustainable weight loss. Long term weight loss comes from first inculcating the correct habits.
Inability to inculcate the correct habits are the main reason why most people get rebound weight gain. They look for short cuts. One such habit that a lot of people avoid is the habit of exercise. Another is the habit of eating wisely. In order to sustain weight loss, one’s awareness level has to be raised. All this takes time. It also takes time to lose fat. The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) advocates losing 1 to 2 pounds of weight per week. That is about the maximum amount of weight that an adult body can burn.

Slow is fast and Fast is Slow
I have seen lots of people trying to lose weight fast and yet end up at the same weight a few months after losing it. This becomes an endless downward spiral. Based on the 1 to 2 pounds of healthy weight loss advocated by the ACSM, one can easily lose 30 to 50 pounds per year. Yet people look for quick fixes and end up at the same weight or heavier after a whole year of dieting and deprivation. But they just never learn. Once the weight is back on, they look for the next quick fix available. Just remember, when it comes to weight loss, slow is fast and fast is slow. This is correct weight loss.


Friday, 2 December 2011

The Story of Bottled Water (2010)

Trivial Pursuit

Why are we going on like idiots about a non-event like a hundredth hundred, this half-wit’s holy grail?
Had Tendulkar scored six more runs in Bombay against the West Indies, he would have climbed a cricketing Everest: a hundred international hundreds. No one has done this before, not even Bradman. And it’s not as if Bradman didn’t have the time: he played international cricket for nearly as long as Tendulkar has done: 20 years. I can hear pedants object that there were no ODIs in Bradman’s time. So? They had Test matches, didn’t they? And if he played only 52 whose fault was that? Slacker.
How many Test centuries did Bradman have? Twenty-nine. Twenty-nine? Tendulkar has 51. If he had gotten those six runs he would have had 52 Test centuries, one for every Test that Bradman played. That would have been a record too. Not as great as a hundred international hundreds, you understand, but a minor landmark in Sachin’s unmatched career.
How well I remember the great Muralitharan’s thousandth international wicket. How it was anticipated, how tense we were when he got to 999, how relieved when the great man winkled out… the name escapes me, but Cricinfo’s Statsguru is bound to have it. Murali went on to take 1334 international wickets, 800 in Test matches and 534 in ODIs. The last 334 wickets were surplus to requirement because it’s round numbers that count. Like a hundred hundreds. There’s a ring to it. A century of centuries! My sources in The Telegraph tell me that the paper has planned an eight-inch headline, just a single word: CEN-DULKAR! You read it here first.
Warne understood the round number thing: the moment he got to 1001 wickets (he got the extra one because Hindus believe it’s auspicious) he called it a day. You didn’t know that Warne had a thousand international wickets (708 in Test matches and 293 in ODIs)? Those numbers don’t trip off your tongue? And you call yourself a fan. Pah. You didn’t know he was a closet Hindu? He gets it from his girlfriend, Elizabeth Hurley, who, before she took up with him, was married to one. How to explain the grandeur of Tendulkar’s imminent achievement when you’re surrounded by illiterates who don’t know the basics about cricket?
I’m joking, naturally. The real cricketing illiterates are the people who believe that adding ODI centuries to Test centuries and arriving at a hundred gives you a heroic landmark. It doesn’t. This isn’t just a meaningless statistic, it’s a pernicious one because it equalizes two different orders of achievement.
Making a hundred in a Test is a lot harder than making a hundred in an ODI. The opposition’s best bowlers can bowl at you endlessly instead of being limited to 10 overs, Test cricket features many more close-in catchers and as the pitch deteriorates over five days, batting gets harder. Getting runs quickly is harder too because the fielding captain can set defensive fields without the field restrictions that make ODI cricket a leather hunt for the bowling side.
To club one-day centuries with Test centuries is to implicitly argue that Tendulkar’s epic hundred at WACA on his first tour of Australia is the same sort of score as the meaningless hundreds he scored in those squalid ODIs against Pakistan in Sharjah. It isn’t and when we suggest that it is by inventing this empty category, ‘international hundreds’, we devalue Test cricket and debase the currency of cricketing terms.
It is to speak and think like a child with ninety-nine coins in his piggy-bank, fifty-one made of silver and forty-eight of lead, who is dying to acquire one more coin of either kind because he will then have a hundred metal coins. The child can be indulged because he’s too young to know better but what of the grown men and women who follow cricket and report and comment on it, who carry on as if something monumental is about to happen each time Tendulkar crosses 50 and then mime tragedy when it doesn’t? Even children know that winning a game of checkers isn’t the same as winning a game of chess even though they’re played over the same 64 squares.
So why are we going on like idiots about this non-event, this half-wit’s holy grail? Why can’t we be content to celebrate Tendulkar’s real achievement? Fifty-one Test hundreds… say that slowly because no one will ever score more. And if you must celebrate his 48 ODI centuries, do, but as a distinct and separate achievement. There’s no such thing as an international hundred. If you do want to join his Test centuries to some other figure to bulk out his numbers, add them to his 27 first class hundreds: at least those were made in the same four-innings format of the game.
The reason no breathless Indian television anchor is hyperventilating about Tendulkar’s 78 first class centuries is because that number doesn’t sufficiently distinguish the great man: there are many batsman who have better numbers. Tendulkar, whose 22-year career shadows India’s history since ‘liberalization’, has become, through no fault of his own, the totem of New India’s self-congratulatory middle class. He is at once their redeemer and their guarantee of self-worth. He must, therefore, be a singular genius: in the heaven of cricket, there must only be one god: Tendulkar. And so a copywriter’s meaningless catchphrase becomes a cricketing statistic: a hundred international hundreds.
Cricket does have one true god who lives alone in his own private heaven; unluckily for desis he isn’t Tendulkar, he is the aforementioned Bradman. Everyone else from Hobbs to Lara is part of a supporting pantheon of demi-gods. Tendulkar is amongst the most distinguished of these but he isn’t pre-eminent, not even in this second-echelon host.
He isn’t even the greatest cricketer of his generation. Muttiah Muralitharan’s career figures as a bowler are more extraordinary than Tendulkar’s career figures as a batsman and if you think his action disqualifies him, Shane Warne makes for a pretty good substitute. And yet, I don’t remember (and neither do you) anyone even noticing their thousandth international wickets. That’s because they didn’t (notionally at least) have a billion consuming customers at their backs who shared a nation with them.
I believe that Sachin Tendulkar has a substantial claim to being considered the greatest Test and one-day batsman of his generation. This is a very large achievement with which he (and we) must be content. We don’t need to gild this lily with tacky, trashy ‘statistics’. To use ‘a hundred hundreds’ to winch Tendulkar up on to a pedestal is to disrespect the great players he has played alongside.
Consider Jacques Kallis who, after 16 years at the top, has a Test batting average higher than Tendulkar’s. He also has 271 Test wickets to Tendulkar’s 45 and 169 catches to Tendulkar’s 110. If I was a mindless South African fan looking for numbers to prove that my man was the best, I could legitimately argue that you would need to merge Sachin Tendulkar with Zaheer Khan to come up with Jacques Kallis. Zaheer, our best strike bowler for years, has 273 wickets, barely more than Kallis. Do these numbers clinch the claim that Kallis is the more significant player? No they don’t, because greatness in cricket can’t always be boiled down to numbers… which is something that Tendulkar’s mindless cheerleaders would do well to remember.
The most worrying thing of all is that the Little Master seems to have drunk his own Kool-Aid. For the last several innings he has looked weighed down by the pressure of this non-event. Someone should whisper in his ear that he is a great man, that this absurd quest is beneath him. If he does get a hundred the next time he plays a Test innings, he ought to value it as an oblique salute to Bradman, not an ersatz tribute to himself. There is no hundredth hundred to be had: the whole, in this case, is less than the sum of its parts.

Event of the Year: ICC Cricket World Cup 2011


Without doubt, the Cricket World Cup wins this one.
Co-hosted by India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, the World Cup eclipsed every other event between the 19thof February and the 2nd of April this year. The fact that India won the Cup on home soil was the perfect icing on the cake. Images of Sachin being carried on the shoulders of the Indian team will be etched forever in the memories of this generation. As will the euphoria of that night, as revelers poured into the streets dancing, united by joy and shared nationality.

Sportsperson of the Year: Sachin Tendulkar


Is there any surprise here? Sachin might well be the sportsperson of the decade, if not the last two decades and indeed, for a better part of this millennium for India. As compatriot and starry-eyed fellow player Virat Kohli put it, for the better part of 20 years, Sachin has carried the burden of a nation's expectation on his shoulders alone.
For having inspired a nation to put aside its religious, linguistic and other like divides aside every time he picks up the willow and takes centrestage on the cricket ground, Sachin Tendulkar, teen prodigy turned the player who defines the 'gentleman' part of the gentleman's game, is this year's sportsperson of the year, his elusive 100th ton aside.

Movie of the Year: Murder 2



We live in an era where brand and franchise have become the order of the day. Although Murderwas released seven years ago, it continues to linger in public memory, not only for its sizzle but for its edge-of-seat entertainment. The sequel successfully carries the Murder brand another step forward.
This time around, the director has brought back the movie with a whole new cast. Compared to what Anurag Basu did in MurderMurder 2 is darker, more erotic and bolder. The plot is well delivered, with characters used to the fullest. To sum it up, Mohit Suri has made a remarkable effort in taking forward the success of Anurag Basu’s Murder.